Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-01

WRIT - B No. 221 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 221 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 221 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 221 of 2026 Pushpa Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation,Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Shanker Pandey, Rina Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Devraj Singh, Shashwat Srivastava, Uma Shankar Sahai Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court by the petitioner is taken on record. Preliminary objection filed today in Court by respondent no.4 is also taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned ACSC for respondent nos.1 to 3/State and Shri U.S. Sahai, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 3. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging an order dated 04.02.2026 whereby the revision preferred in the light of the directions given in the order dated 09.07.2025 came to be rejected. Earlier order passed by the appellate Court dated 23.12.2024 was affirmed. 4. Facts that emerge from the petition, in brief, are that one Sadhu was recorded tenure holder and was belonging to Scheduled Castes. It is alleged that the main original tenure holder Sadhu died and the petitioner claim

WRIT - B No. 221 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam