Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-23

WRIT - B No. 1767 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 1767 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 1767 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1767 of 2026 Vijay Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus Board Of Revenue Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhtar Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh Court No. - 55 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Akhtar Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Rohit Yadav holding brief of Sri Sunil Kumar Singh for the respondent no.5. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order of the respondent no. 1, dated 14.1.2026, rejecting the stay application filed by the petitioner alongwith revision filed by him challenging the order of the Additional Commissioner (Administration) - III, Meerut Division, Meerut, dated 15.04.2025. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that by the order dated 28.05.1997, passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Hapur, he was granted benefit of Section 122-B(4F) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, under which, Plot No. 57m, area 0.190 hectare, situated in Village Atuta, Tehsil and District Hapur, was declared as his bhumidhari with n

WRIT - B No. 1767 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam