Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-15

WRIT - B No. 112 of 2001 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 112 of 2001 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 112 of 2001 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 112 of 2001 Nand Lal .....Petitioner(s) Versus D.D.C.Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.C.Kashish Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., A. Pandey, Deepak Chandra Jain, Dhiraj Chaurasia, Nitin Srivastava, R.B.Singh, Ravi Shanker Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. C.M.Application No. 52897 of 2017 1. Counsel for the applicant does not want to press application for recall of the impleadment on account of death of respondent no.2. 2. Accordingly the application is rejected as not pressed. C.M. Application No. I.A/18/2023 1. This application has been filed seeking recall of abatement on account of petition having abated in absence of any substitution of the legal heir of respondent no.2, who died during the pendency of the petition. C.M. Application No. I.A. 18/2023 1. This application has been filed seeking impleadment/ substitution in place of respondents no.2 and 3. 2. On account of death of respondent no.2, the property coming in favour of her by-virtue of a will executed in their favour . 3. The cause shown is sufficient. 4. Abatement is recalled and impleadment at the instance

WRIT - B No. 112 of 2001 at Lucknow · Niyam