Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-20

WRIT - B No. 1037 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 1037 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 1037 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1037 of 2026 Ram Pati .....Petitioner(s) Versus Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Poonam Yadav, Raj Karan Yadav, Yadvendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C., Jitendra Rpasad Kushwaha, Nikhil Shukla Court No. - 54 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Yadvendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. J.P. Kushwaha, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 to 10, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Brief facts of the case are that proceedings under Section 12 of U.P.C.H. Act were initiated by Shyam Lal and others, which were registered as Case No. 45 of 2018-19 in respect to Khata No. 290, for recording the name of all four sons of deceased Ram Nath including legal heirs of Harilal in place of Ram Nath. Second set of claim was filed by petitioner Ram Pati wife of Jokhulal in respect to Chak No.166 on the basis of unregistered will dated 4.5.1990. Consolidation Officer vide order dated 03.11.2017 rejected the claim of the petitioner-Ram Pati. Accordingly, revision under Section

WRIT - B No. 1037 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam