Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-30

WRIT - A No. 6367 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 6367 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 6367 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6367 of 2026 Amresh Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus Superintendent Of Police And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Deo Prakash Singh, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Indraj Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ved Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2.The order dated 04.08.2025 of punishment by which the salary of the petitioner for 16 days was not paid on the ground of no work no pay passed by the respondent No.1/Superintendent of Police, District Bhadohi affirmed by respondent no.2/Inspector General of Police Vindhyachal Range, Vidhyachal U.P. Mirzapur by its order dated 22.01.2026. 3. It is argued by learned Standing Counsel that against the order impugned, the petitioner has alternative remedy to file revision as provided under Rule 23 of Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment And Appeal) Rules, 1991. 4. In response to the same, it is argued by learned Senior Counsel that pursuant to the show cause notice, a detailed reply had

WRIT - A No. 6367 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam