WRIT - A No. 3390 of 2026 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3390 of 2026 Surya Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Namit Srivastava, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kunwar Bahadur Srivastava Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Namit Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri K.B. Srivastava, learned counsel for Respondents-3 and 4. 2. The Court finds that there is a merit in the argument of learned Senior Advocate since it is based on a judgment passed by a Full Bench of this Court in Ram Chandra Pandey vs. District Administrative Committee U.P. Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Societies Centralized Service, Bahraich and others, 1998(1) AWC 125 wherein an issue of suspension of a Member/ Secretary of Centralize Service was under consideration and reference was answered in following manner: “17. Our answer to the questions referred to before are as under : (i) The Member/Secretary can suspend a member of the centralised service under Regulation 59 (1) (f) (i) in the absence of a decision of the Distric