Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-16

WRIT - A No. 3126 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 3126 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 3126 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 3126 of 2026 Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Shukla, Ashutosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinav Ojha, C.S.C. Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. Modification In Order Application No. 2/2026 1. Heard Sri B.D. Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashutosh Shukla, learned counsel for applicant-petitioner and Sri Abhinav Ojha, learned counsel for DUDA, Jhansi. 2. This Court has passed following order in writ on 25.03.2026 :- "1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R. Mishra, holding brief of Sri Abhinav Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is employed through outsourcing by respondent no.5 and now he has been transferred vide order dated 22.1.2026, by the respondent no.3 from Jhansi to Hathras, however, he is still not relieved, therefore, he is not able to join at transferred place i.e. Hathras. 3. Learned counsel for respondents submits that if petitioner has already not been relieved, be relieved within 2 days. 4. Thi

WRIT - A No. 3126 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam