Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-15

WRIT - A No. 2982 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2982 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2982 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 2982 of 2026 Sudha Dhaura .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical And Health Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kishor Pandey, Raghunath Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 18 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the respondents. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the impugned transfer order dated 28.02.2026, contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner in compliance of the order dated 20.06.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 479 of 2026 has been rejected by means of the impugned order dated 28.02.2026, contained in Annexure No. 1. It is contended that the said order has been passed without due application of mind, inasmuch as the opposite parties have proceeded on an erroneous presumption that the petitioner’s husband would have retired on 31.04.2025 upon attaining the age of superannuation. It is further submitted that the petitioner’s husband,

WRIT - A No. 2982 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam