Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-24

VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES vs HARSHVARDHAN CHAHAL & ANR.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-505/2026 2026:DHC:3439
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES
Respondent
HARSHVARDHAN CHAHAL & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 24th April, 2026 CM(M) 505/2026 VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Malhotra, Mr. Taksh Suri and Mr. Sahil Ahuja, Advocates. versus HARSHVARDHAN CHAHAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Dr. Puran Chand and Ms. Anita Chahal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 12th February, 2026, passed by the learned Trial Court in case bearing No. CS SCJ 1188/22, whereby the right of the petitioner/defendant no. 3 to lead his evidence has been closed. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has not been given sufficient opportunities to lead his evidence. It is further argued that grave prejudice would be caused to the petitioner if the opportunity to lead his evidence is not granted. 5. Per Contra, learned Counsel for the respondent/plaintiff has argued CM(M) 505/2026 6. Keeping in view the