URVASHI AGGARWAL vs INDER PAUL AGGARWAL

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 13.01.2026 Pronounced on: 13.04.2026 + MAT.APP. 6/2012, CM APPL. 3834/2020, CM APPL. 2452/2021, CM APPL. 3722/2021, CM APPL. 23260/2017 URVASHI AGGARWAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal and Mr. Parth Mahajan, Advs. Versus INDER PAUL AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Archit Mishra, Mr. Ayush Anand, Mr. Giriraj Singhal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR JUDGMENT 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “HMA”) against the judgment and decree dated 28.11.2011 passed by the learned Judge- 01, Family Courts, Rohini Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “Family Court”) in HMA No. 147/2010 and HMA No. 390/2010, whereby, the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13(1)(ia) was allowed and the petition filed by the appellant-wife under Section 9 of the HMA was dismissed. 2. In the present appeal, the appellant has only sought to set aside the impugned judgment only qua the grant of divorce decree, claiming Signature Not Verified MAT.APP. 6/2012 Page 1 of 19 Signed By:BABINDER SINGH NEGI Signing Date:13.04.2026 11:26:19 the following relief: “In the circumstances it is therefore prayed that judgment and decree dated 28.11.2011 passed by the Court of Shri Dilbagh Singh Judge Family Courts, Rohini Courts, Delhi in H.M.A. No. 147/2010 (Old No. 57/2006) and H.M.A. No. 390/2010 (old No. 109/2008) be set aside & the present appeal be allowed and the petition filed by the respondent for divorce be dismissed with cost. Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the appellant and against