Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-04-15

TRIDOSS LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR vs UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS

Citation / case number
WP/2789/2017
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
TRIDOSS LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

WP2789_17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2789 OF 2017 Tridoss Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and another … Petitioners Vs. Union of India and others … Respondents Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Surabhi Agrawal, Mr. Vishal Maheshwari and Ms. Kamini Pansare i/b. VM Legal for Petitioners. Mr. A. S. Khandeparkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. P. Singh, Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh and Ms. Vaidehi Pradeep for Respondent No.1 - UOI. Ms. Uma Rahi, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 - State. CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ. Reserved on : MARCH 16, 2026 Pronounced on: APRIL 15, 2026 ORDER : (Per Justice Manish Pitale) . The petitioner No.1 is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical products and petitioner No.2 is its authorized representative. They have filed this petition being aggrieved by a demand notice dated 15.02.2016 issued by respondent No.1 i.e. Union of India through Department of Pharmaceuticals as also impugned notice of demand issued to a defaulter by respondent No.3 Tahsildar under Section 267 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (for short ‘MLR Code’).