Delhi High Court · 2026-04-27
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD vs M/S FRANS GLOBAL INFOTECH LTD.
- Citation / case number
- O.M.P. (COMM)-119/2026 2026:DHC:3539
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD
- Respondent
- M/S FRANS GLOBAL INFOTECH LTD.
Judgment text excerpt
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 07.04.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 27.04.2026 + O.M.P. (COMM) 119/2026 TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amitesh Chandra Mishra, Ms. Vishakha, Mr. Mrityunjai Singh and Mr. Harshit S Gahlot, Advocates. versus M/S FRANS GLOBAL INFOTECH LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rizwan, Ms. Sachi Chopra and Mr. Samarth Sharma, Advocates. + O.M.P. (COMM) 555/2025 M/S FRANS GLOBAL INFOTECH PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rizwan, Ms. Sachi Chopra and Mr. Samarth Sharma, Advocates. versus TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amitesh Chandra Mishra, Ms. Vishakha, Mr. Mrityunjai Singh and Mr. Harshit S Gahlot, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR Signature Not Verified O.M.P. (COMM) 119/2026 & connected matter Page 1 of 42 Digitally Signed By:NEERU Signing Date:29.04.2026 10:27:23 JUDGMENT 1. The present Petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, being OMP (COMM) 119/2026 filed by Telecommunications Consultants India Limited2 and OMP (COMM) 555/2025 filed by Frans Global Infotech Private Limited3, arise out of a common Arbitral Award dated 24.09.20254 passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal5, comprising a Sole Arbitrator, in disputes inter se the parties. 2. It is noted that Frans was the Claimant before the learned AT, whereas, TCIL was the Respondent. 3. By way of OMP (COMM) 119/2026, TCIL has laid a challenge to the Impugned Award insofar as it allows certain claims in favour of Frans and rejects the counter-claims preferred by TCIL. 4. Conversely, by way of OMP (COMM) 555/2025, Frans has assailed the Impugned Award to the extent that its Claim Nos. 1, 2 and 6 have been reject