Delhi High Court · 2026-04-23
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED vs M/S UNIQUE AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
- Citation / case number
- ARB.P.-1782/2025 2026:DHC:3389
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- TATA CAPITAL LIMITED
- Respondent
- M/S UNIQUE AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23.04.2026 ARB.P. 1782/2025 & I.A. 31638/2025 (Seeking permission for amendment of the memo of parties) TATA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Kumar and Ms. Ragini Kapoor, Advocates. versus M/S UNIQUE AUTO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Khyati Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Loan-cum-Guarantee Agreement dated 19.08.2023 [“Agreement”]. 2. The material on record reflects that the Agreement stipulates a dispute resolution mechanism, which contemplates reference of disputes thereunder, inter se the parties, to Arbitration. The relevant stipulation is contained in Clause 12 of the Agreement [“Arbitration clause”]. The relevant portion of the same reads as follows:- “12. Arbitration If any dispute, difference or claim arises between any of the Obligors and the Lender in connection with the Facility or as to the i