Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-21

SUNIL @ SONU vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-890/2026 2026:DHC:3297
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SUNIL @ SONU
Respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 890/2026 SUNIL @ SONU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shrikant Sharma and Mr. Rishu Lal Karan, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Anil Kumar CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 873/2021 of Police Station S.P. Badli for offence under Section 302/34 IPC. 2. Broadly speaking, prosecution case is that on the fateful day, the accused Hukum Chand called the deceased Abhishek under the pretext of returning the money borrowed from the deceased. Once the deceased reached the spot, the accused Hukum Chand and the present accused/applicant as well as co-accused Harish and Meena assaulted the deceased with cricket bat and danda causing fatal injuries. The FIR was registered on the complaint of the alleged eye witness Ankush. BAIL APPLN. 890/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, 3. It is contended by learned counsel for accused/applicant that there is no evidence to keep the accu

SUNIL @ SONU vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) · Niyam