SUBHASH @ BABLOO vs STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of reserving Judgment: 9th March, 2026 Date of decision: 7th April, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF: + CRL.A. 1469/2010 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 2542/2025 SUBHASH @ BABLOO .....Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj & Mr. Priyal Bhardwaj, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Priyanta, PS Lodhi Colony. Mr. Sanjay Gupta (DHCLSC) for prosecutrix. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV JUDGMENT VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Appellant Subhash @ Babloo was held guilty under Section 363/366/376 Indian Penal Code („IPC‟) vide the impugned judgment dated 10.08.2010 and was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) through the order on sentence dated 11.08.2010, whereby RI for a period of two years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- was awarded under Section 363 IPC, in default of payment of fine, he was directed to undergo Simple Imprisonment (SI) for one month. Whereas, Appellant was awarded RI for a period of three years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- under Section 366 IPC, with rider that in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo SI for a period of 2 months and Signature Not Verified Signed By:ASHOK CRL.A. 1469/2010 Page 1 of 17 KUMAR CHOUHAN Signing Date:08.04.2026 14:43:25 finally, he was sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence under Section 376 IPC, in default of payment of fine, he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 3 months. 2. Assailing the aforesaid judgment of conviction and the sentence awarded, the Appellant preferred the instant appeal, which is hereby disposed of. 3. The indispensable facts are required to be looked into before adverting into the details and intricacies of the contentions raised by