SH DEEPAK DATT RHRAMA @ DEEPAK DUTT SHARMA AND ORS vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02nd April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2461/2026 & CRL.M.A. 10039/2026 SH DEEPAK DATT RHRAMA @ DEEPAK DUTT SHARMA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Bijendra Kumar Pathak, Advocate with petitioner No.1 and petitioner Nos.2 to 6 through V.C. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Ashish Sharma, PS Nand Nagri. Mr. Aakash Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 570/2023 dated 06.09.2023, registered at Police Station Nand Nagri for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 06.12.2020, as per Hindu rites and customs. There is no child from the abovesaid wedlock. 3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties started residing separately and when a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, it Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 2461/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:04.04.2026 14:54:47 resulted into registration of the abovesaid FIR. 4. Charge-sheet has already been filed. 5. However, when the parties were referred to Counseling Cell, Family Court, Karkardooma, Shahdara, Delhi, they came to amicable resolution of the matter and agreed to part ways in a graceful manner as would be apparent from Settlement Deed dated 09.10.2025. 6. It is in the abovesaid backdrop that quashing is being sought. 7. Respondent no. 2 is present in