Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-04-30

SANGITA SANTOSH CHAVAN vs BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

Citation / case number
WP/2532/2026
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
SANGITA SANTOSH CHAVAN
Respondent
BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

400077. Mob:8850029140 Email ID: [email protected] ...Petitioner Vs. 1. Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation through the Municipal Commissioner, BMC Headquarters, Mumbai – 400 001. 2. Assistant Commissioner (Estate) Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, BMC Headquarters, Mumbai – 400 001 3. Chief Personnel Officers (General Administration), Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, BMC Headquarters, Mumbai – 400 001 ...Respondents ----------------- Mr. Rajeshwar G. Panchal, a/w Mr. Sarang S. Gundajwar, Mr. Bhushan Kedare and Mr. Vivekanand G Panchal, for the Petitioner. Ms. Rupali Adhate i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi for Respondent – BMC. Ms. Padma Chavan, Administrative Officer and Ms. Shweta Dhawade, Head Clerk, Estate Dept. present. ----------------- CORAM : R. I. CHAGLA AND ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. RESERVED ON : 15 APRIL 2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 30 APRIL 2026 JUDGMENT:- (PER ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of the parties. Shubham 1/19 2 J-WPL-2334-2026.doc 2. This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The substantive prayer in the Petition reads thus:- “(A) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue the writ of certiorari,