SANDEEP SINGH vs JAMIA HAMDARD ( HAMDARD UNIVERSITY) & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 17th April 2026 + LPA 275/2026 & CM APPL. 25197/2026 SANDEEP SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ravindra S. Garia, Mr. Shashank Singh, Mr. G Srinivas Reddy & Mr. Vinit Raj, Advocates. versus JAMIA HAMDARD (HAMDARD UNIVERSITY) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Dr. Swaroop George, Mr. Mohbashshir Sarwar, Mr. Abhinandan Jain, Mr. Shiavam Prajapati, Mr. Abhigyan Dwivedi & Mr. Takrim Asshan Khan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL JUDGMENT DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. (ORAL) CM APPL. 25198/2026 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. LPA 275/2026 1. Heard counsel for appellant, as also counsel for respondent no.1/University. 2. This appeal seeks to take exception to the order dated 10th April 2026 passed by Single Judge whereby, W.P.(C) No. 4775/2026, instituted by the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed LPA 275/2026 1/15 By:MANISH KUMAR Signing Date:22.04.2026 15:19:11 appellant, has been dismissed and the claim of appellant for treating his appointment with respondent no.1/University to have been made on regular basis against the post of Security Inspector, has not been acceded to. 3. Facts which are relevant for the purposes of adjudication of the issues involved in this appeal, in brief, are as under: (i) On 3rd March 2022, an advertisement was issued by respondent no.1/University for appointment on different non-teaching posts on regular/deputation/contractual basis. The post of Security Inspector was also advertised to be filled in and the pay-scale admissible for the said post, as per advertisement, was Rs. 29200-Rs. 92300 at Level V. Appellant made his application pursuant to said advertisement and was accordin