ROHIT @MONA vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25.04.2026 W.P.(CRL) 616/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9161/2026 ROHIT @MONA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anmol Kumar Pandey, Advocate (through video conferencing) and Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates with SI Arun Kumar. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has challenged rejection of his parole application. The parole application was rejected on the ground that one month gap has to be maintained between the completion of furlough availed and application for parole. Learned ASC submits that in any case now, more than one month has passed after completion of the furlough availed by the petitioner, so now he can be considered for parole. 2. After some discussion, with consent of both sides, the petition is disposed of directing the competent authority to treat this petition as fresh W.P.(CRL) 616/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, 3. Pending application s