ROHIT @MONA vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 25.04.2026 + W.P.(CRL) 616/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9161/2026 ROHIT @MONA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anmol Kumar Pandey, Advocate (through video conferencing) and Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates with SI Arun Kumar. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has challenged rejection of his parole application. The parole application was rejected on the ground that one month gap has to be maintained between the completion of furlough availed and application for parole. Learned ASC submits that in any case now, more than one month has passed after completion of the furlough availed by the petitioner, so now he can be considered for parole. 2. After some discussion, with consent of both sides, the petition is disposed of directing the competent authority to treat this petition as fresh W.P.(CRL) 616/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, Signature Not Verified serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.25 05:10:11 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:25.04.2026 17:14:12 application of the petitioner for grant of parole, which shall be decided within three weeks, otherwise, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek relief directly from this court. At request of learned counsel for petitioner, not opposed by learned ASC, it is made clear that the entitlement of the pe