ROHIT AND ORS vs THE STATE ( N.C.T OF DELHI ) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 22nd April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3048/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12421/2026 ROHIT AND ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Surendra Pandit and Mr. Upendra Patel, Advocates along with petitioners-in-person versus THE STATE ( N.C.T OF DELHI ) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for State/R-1 with ASI Amit Kumar and ASI Ramesh Kumar, PS Bara Hindu Rao Mr. Satish Bajaj, Advocate for R-2 (Through VC) Respondent No. 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 100/2022 dated 02.03.2022, registered at Police Station Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized on 11.12.2020 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. There is no child from such wedlock. 3. On account of some matrimonial discord and temperamental differences, respondent No. 2 reported the matter to the police which resulted Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 3048/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:24.04.2026 11:35:44 in registration of aforesaid FIR. 4. Charge-sheet has already been filed but charges have yet not been framed. 5. Next date before the learned Trial Court is stated to be 24.04.2026. 6. Fact, however, remains that in relation to one Complaint Case filed under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, when the parties were referred to mediation, they were able to resolve all their disputes under the aegis of Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in terms of Mediation Order dated 02.06.2025. 7. Respondent No. 2 i