ROHIL NAIN vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 7th April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2600/2026 & CRL.M.A. 10581/2026 ROHIL NAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Nain, Mr. Charu Sharma and Mr. Chanderjeet Yadav, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for State/R-1 with SI Divya Dagar, PS Connaught Place Mr. Utkarsh Kumar Singh and Mr. Hemant Gupta, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 63/2026 dated 14.03.2026, registered at Police Station Connaught Place for commission of offences under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/299/351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 323/341/295A/506 IPC), along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Respondent No. 1 had gone to his office located in Connaught Place and when he was returning in his Kia Seltos Car, one Honda Amaze Car blocked his vehicle while coming from wrong side. When he asked the concerned driver i.e. petitioner herein to pull over, it resulted into scuffle and in the process, respondent no. 2 was abused, assaulted and in the melee, his Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 2600/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:08.04.2026 17:53:40 turban also got knocked off. 3. Fact, however, remains that within no time, both the sides have entered into amicable settlement. Terms of settlement have been reduced in writing on 27.03.2026, copy of which is also on record. 4. Investigation is not yet complete but learned Addl. P.P. for State, who is assisted by the investigating officer concerned, submits that incident in question reveals commission of aforesaid offences only. 5. Petitioner seek