Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-28

RAVINDRA CHAUDHARY vs LAXMI CHAND GUPTA

Citation / case number
CM(M)-965/2026 2026:DHC:3592
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAVINDRA CHAUDHARY
Respondent
LAXMI CHAND GUPTA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 28th April, 2026 CM(M) 965/2026, CM APPL. 28296/2026 & CM APPL. 28297/2026 RAVINDRA CHAUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kamal, Ms. Narayani and Ms. Dimpy, Advs. versus LAXMI CHAND GUPTA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 13th February, 2026 passed by the learned Trial Court in case bearing No. CS DJ 396/2021, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/defendant no. 1 under Order VIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been dismissed. 3. Heard. Record perused. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the trial court has passed the impugned order on the basis of surmises and conjectures which is 5. The operative portion of the impugned order dated 13th February, 2026 reads as follows: “Heard. Record perused. The written statement of the defendant no.1 was taken off the record on 23.