RAVI KHURANA & ORS. vs STATE & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 04.04.2026 + CRL.M.C. 236/2026 RAVI KHURANA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioner no.1 in person. Petitioners no.2 to 5 in person (through videoconferencing). versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with SI Shweta, PS Tilak Nagar. Respondent no.2 in person (through videoconferencing). CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 638/2022 of PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Petitioner no.1 in person and remaining petitioners through videoconferencing have appeared. Respondent no.2 identified by IO/SI Shweta also has appeared through videoconferencing. The State has no CRL.M.C.236/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557099 6b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.04 14:29:59 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:04.04.2026 14:32:39 objection to this petition. Further, statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. 3. Keeping in mind nature of these proceedings, I again spoke with the respondent no.2 and she submits that now all her matrimonial disputes stand completely settled. It is submitted by her that marriage between her and petitioner no.1 stands dissolved by way of decree of divorce by way of mutual consent