RAMA RANI HOTA vs PRASANNA KUMAR HOTA AND ORS.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 06.04.2026 Pronounced on: 16.04.2026 + MISC. APPEAL (PMLA) 27/2026 & CM APPL. 21571/2026 SMT. RAMA RANI HOTA .....Appellant Through: Mr.Gaurav Gupta, Ms.Nidhi Singh, Mr.Abhishek Samal, Ms.Nisha Nandani Singh, Ms.Isha Rajgharia and Mr.Abhishek Pareek, Advs. versus SH. PRASANNA KUMAR HOTA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT NAVIN CHAWLA, J. 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 49 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 („PBPT Act‟), challenging the order dated 12.09.2025 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA at New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Tribunal”) in MP-PBPT-2784/CHD/2025 in FPA-PBPT- 1190/CHD/2020 titled Sh. Prasanna Kumar Hota v. The Initiating Officer, BPU, Chandigarh, whereby the application for intervention filed by the appellant herein, being MP-PBPT-2784/CHD/2025, was 315. The judgement, in the case of Ganapati Dealcom (supra) has been recalled by the Apex Court vide its order dated 18.10.24 with liberty to parties to seek review of the order if it was passed relying the judg