Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-21

RAJ KUMAR vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-1312/2026 2026:DHC:3312
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1312/2026 RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Bharti and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Naveen, PS Cyber/NW. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 103/2025 of Police Station Cyber North-West Delhi for offence under Section 317(2)/61(2)/112 of BNS. 2. After last date, status report was filed. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Naveen. 3. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case is as follows. From records of National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (NCRP), information was obtained BAIL APPLN. 1312/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, 4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is also submitted that it is not believable that the accused/applicant, knowing the consequences, wou