PRASHANT vs THE STATE( NCT OF DELHI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 901/2026 PRASHANT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Tiwari, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with Inspector Ghanshyam CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 122/2024 of Police Station I.P. Estate, Delhi for offence under Section 302/148/149/120B/34 IPC and Section 25/27 Arms Act. 2. In furtherance of last order, status report was filed. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State assisted by IO/Inspector Ghanshyam. 3. Broadly speaking, prosecution case is as follows. On the fateful day at about 07:00pm, when the accused/applicant went to meet his girlfriend, he was assaulted by brother of his girlfriend to such an extent that he had to be admitted in the hospital with serious injuries. Thereafter, on the same day at BAIL APPLN. 901/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, 4. Learned counsel for accused