PARMINDER RAI vs CANARA BANK E SYNDICATE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 30th April, 2026 Uploaded on: 02nd May, 2026 RFA(COMM) 165/2025 & CM APPL. 15394/2025 PARMINDER RAI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Ms. Pallavi Sharma Kansal, Mr. Suraj Kumar Jha, Ms. Sakshi Tiwari, Mr. Raghav Vij, Mr. Pratham malik, Ms. Ritul Sharma & Ms. Vanshika Kapoor, Advs. (M:8677824799) versus CANARA BANK E SYNDICATE .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rekha Rustagi & Ms. Mitanshi Rustagi, Advs. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the Appellant – Parminder Rai, challenging the order dated 21st September, 2024 (hereinafter ‘impugned judgment’) passed by District Judge (Commercial Court)-01, Tis Hazari Courts, West District, Delhi, in case titled ‘Canara Bank v. Sh. Parminder Rai’ bearing CS (Comm.) No. 584/2022. 3. Vide the impugned judgment, the District Judge has decreed the suit filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff i.e., Canara Bank (e-Syndicate) against the Defendant, who is the Appellant herein, thereby directing the Appella