PANKAJ KUMAR vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 6thApril, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2525/2026 & CRL.M.A. 10251/2026 PANKAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Singh & Mr. Pawan Verma, Advocates along with petitioner. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Anil Kumar, PS GTB Enclave. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) [ 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 590/2024 dated 21.12.2024, registered at P.S. G.T.B. Enclave, Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 74/79/115(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 354/509/323 IPC), along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. As per the allegations appearing in abovesaid FIR, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein were running a small shop. On 10.12.2024, accused i.e. the petitioner herein had come to their shop in inebriated state and started quarrelling with them and pushed and assaulted them in an appropriate way. He was also carrying some weapon and had caused injury to respondent no. 3. 3. Charge-sheet has already been filed. 4. Fact remains that during the pendency of the abovesaid matter, when Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL CRL.M.C. 2525/2026 Page 1 of 3 Signing Date:07.04.2026 18:21:24 the parties were referred to Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, they were able to resolve all their disputes. Terms of settlement are found recorded in Mediation order dated 18.02.2026. 5. Petitioner is present in Court. 6. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are also present in Court and have been duly identified by their counsel as well as by Investigating Officer. When asked, they reiterated the terms of the abovesaid