Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-29

NITESH ALIAS VINAY vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-768/2026 2026:DHC:3619
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
NITESH ALIAS VINAY
Respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 768/2026 NITESH ALIAS VINAY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Deepak Yadav, PS Mundka. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 610/2024 of Police Station Mundka West for offence under Section 309(4)/317(2)/ 309(6)/311/3(5) BNS. 2. Despite last order, status report was not filed. However, today IO/SI Deepak has appeared to assist the learned prosecutor. 3. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State. BAIL APPLN. 768/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557099 4. Broadly speaking, allegation against the accused/applicant is that on 15.09.2024, a PCR call was received informing an armed robbery with the complainant de facto. The IO recorded statement of the complainant de facto, who alleged that two unknown persons robbed him o

NITESH ALIAS VINAY vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) · Niyam