Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-02

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AND TRAINING AND ANR. vs ATUL BISHT AND ANR.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-4323/2026 2026:DHC:2807-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AND TRAINING AND ANR.
Respondent
ATUL BISHT AND ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4323/2026 & CM APPL. 21084/2026 NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AND TRAINING AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, Standing Counsel for NCERT with Mr. Sidhant Sharma and Mr. Aditya Mani Saran, Advs. versus ATUL BISHT AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 02.04.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 24 July 2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 1980/2024. 2. We have heard Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, learned Standing Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Trivedi for the respondents. 3. OA 1980/2024, in which the impugned order has come to be rendered, was instituted by the respondents who had participated in the selection process for selection to the post of TV Producer Grade- 1 “the Tribunal” hereinafter 2023. 4. Respondent 1 belongs to the Unreserved category and Respondent 2 belongs to Other Backward Classes. The prescribed qualification and experience for recruitment were as under: “A. Educational Qualification: • A degree in Mass