NATHU RAM JAIN vs AKHIL BHARTIYA AGRAWAL SAMMELAN THROUGH NATIONAL GENERAL SECRETARY GOPAL GOYAL & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on: 24.04.2026 ARB.P. 738/2026 NATHU RAM JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Dahiya, Ms. Shreya Garg and Ms. Vandana Dahiya, Advs. versus AKHIL BHARTIYA AGRAWAL SAMMELAN THROUGH NATIONAL GENERAL SECRETARY GOPAL GOYAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Thakur Sumit and Mr. Gaurav Rathod, Advs. for R-1 & 2 with R-2 in person. Mr. Kumar Mukesh and Ms. Chetna Goyal, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J (ORAL) I.A. 11218/2026 (under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing the true typed copies and translated copies of dim orders and annexures) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 738/2026 & I.A. 11217/2026 (under Section 151 CPC read with Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996) 3. The present petition has been filed under the provisions of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, „the Act‟] for the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator in terms of Clause 43 of the Constitution (as amended in 2024) of the “Akhil Bhartiya Agrawal Sammelan/respondent no. 1, [hereinafter referred to as,