Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-16

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4948 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4948 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4948 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4948 of 2026 Smt. Pushpa Devi And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Shri Satyapal Singh And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Pratap Singh Chauhan, Sudhanshu Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Durgesh Kumar Singh, Rishabh Narain Singh Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Pandey, learned counsel for the plaintiff- petitioners and Sri Durgesh Kumar Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Bhavni Chaurasiya for the defendant-respondent-revisionist. 2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed, notices are not being issued to the defendant-respondent 2nd set and defendant- respondent 3rd set. 3. The case of the plaintiff-petitioners is that they instituted OS No. 15 of 2025 before the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Koil, District Aligarh seeking permanent injunction against the defendant-respondents restraining them in interfering with the possession of the land in question. An application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC came to be filed by the defendant contesting respondents on the ground that suit itself was not maintainable parti

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4948 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam