Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-23

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4880 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4880 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4880 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4880 of 2026 Jokhan Ram (Since Deceased) and 24 others …..Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and 2 others …..Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, Sanjay Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 5 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Heard Shri K.K. Tiwari along with Shri Sanjay Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Pursuant to previous order of this Court, instructions have been furnished. 3. Petitioners are aggrieved by non-grant of temporary injunction and dismissal of their Misc. Appeal. 2 A227 No. - 4880 of 2026 4. Submission is that the dispute pertains to Gata no. 20 Min, which is a large gata, in which Navin Parti, Talab and Abadi were reported in the inquiry conducted and, insofar as the petitioners are concerned, their claim is confined to the residential structures stranding over part of the said minjumla Gata no. 20. It is contended that once in the reports, it has come that old Abadi exists, irrespective of other status of the gata, unless proceeding

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4880 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam