Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-22

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4366 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4366 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4366 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4366 of 2026 Arun Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus Rameshwar Nath Pandey And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajit Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajay Kumar Sharma, Ritesh Kumar Singh Court No. - 5 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajit Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the contesting respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of his amendment application under Order VI Rule 17, which order has been affirmed in revision. 3. The Original Suit No. 262 of 2000 was filed by the plaintiff petitioner claiming relief of cancellation of a registered sale deed dated 20.3.1989 executed by one Prem Shankar. 4. The amendment application was filed 20 years after institution of suit where the issues were also framed and various paragraphs were sought to be incorporated by way of amendment in the plaint and a relief was also sought to be substituted by a new relief to the effect that in place of relief of cancellation of sale deed, relief of declaration be substituted declaring that the defendants have not acqu

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4366 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam