Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-01

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4165 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4165 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4165 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4165 of 2026 Sudhir Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus Pratima Sharma And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar, Ram Pratap Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Shri Ram Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner decree holder. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the defendant-respondent judgment debtors. 3. The case of the plaintiff-petitioner decree holder is that he instituted suit being O.S. No. 18 of 2017 (Sudhir Kumar v. Pratima Shrma and others) before the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Koil, Aligarh for cancellation of a sale deed dated 10.12.2000 which came to be decreed by judgment and the order dated 31.10.2019/ 14.11.2019 against the judgment and the decree in question, a first appeal had been preferred by the defendant-respondent/ judgment debtor being Appeal No. 26 of 2021 (Smt. Pratima Sharma v. Sunil Kumar) and according to the plaintiff/ petitioner/ decree holder, there is no interim order operating. Thereafter an Execution Case No. 17

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 4165 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam