Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-09

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3817 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3817 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3817 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3817 of 2026 Pranav Dixit .....Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Tanvi .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawankumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of Shri Kashinath Singh Yadav (A/K 0165/12), counsel for respondent, is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. The counsel for the rival parties have made a joint statement that they do not propose to file any further affidavits thus with the consent of the parties, writ petition is being decided at the fresh stage. 4. The case of the plaintiff-petitioner is that his marriage stood solemnized with the defendant-respondent on 04.12.2024 as per the Hindu Rites and Rituals. However, due to matrimonial dispute, they are living separately since 22.02.2025. Proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 came to be instituted for restitution of conjugal rights, the parties were living separately. The matter was referred to mediation, however, the mediation was not successful. Thereafter proceedings in Case No. 109 of 2025 which came to be preferred before the court of Principal Judge,

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 3817 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam