MANOJ RASTOGI vs NEERAJ SRIVASTAVA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4505/2026, CM APPL. 21975/2026 & CM APPL. 21976/2026 Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: MANOJ RASTOGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Sinha Advocate. versus NEERAJ SRIVASTAVA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. The petition is for setting aside orders dated 26.06.2025 and 13.02.2026 passed in arbitration proceedings between the parties herein. Vide both the orders, applications filed by the petitioner seeking permission to lead secondary evidence and to file additional documents have been rejected. 2. As per the case set up by the petitioner, the parties herein are partners at M/s Agronext Ventures LLP and have fifty-percent share each. On account of a dispute having arisen in the said partnership, the respondent, on 10.10.2023, initiated arbitration proceedings seeking recovery of money and 3. The respondent is stated to have filed certain F.I.R registered against the petitioner along with the statement of claim, and the petitioner has, in his statement of defence, refuted the same as irrelevant to the proceedings. 4. In