Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-04-29

MANGAL MAHADU KORDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. MINISTRY AND ORS

Citation / case number
WP/10185/2025
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
MANGAL MAHADU KORDE
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. MINISTRY AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

wp 10185 of 2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10185 OF 2025 Mangal Mahadu Korde ... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents Mr. Anurag R. Mishra i/by Mr. Adwait Bhonde, for Petitioner. Ms. Mamta S. Srivastava, AGP for State. Mr. Ravindra Sonba Pachundkar, for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Mr. Vijaykumar Dighe with Mr. Turerao, for Respondent No.5. SWAROOP SHARAD CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. PHADKE Digitally signed by SWAROOP SHARAD RESERVED ON : 24 FEBRUARY 2026 PHADKE Date: 2026.04.29 22:26:21 +0530 PRONOUNCED ON : 29 APRIL 2026 JUDGMENT : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally. 2. By this Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner takes exception to an order dated 8 May 2025 passed by the State Government in Appeal No.V.P.M. 2024/Pra.Kra.101/P.R.6, whereby the appeal preferred by Respondent No.5 under Section 39(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 (the Act, 1959) against an order passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune in Village Panchayat Dispute No.4 of 2024, thereby declining to remove the Petitioner from the office of Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Wakalwadi, Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, came to be allowed and the Petitioner came to be removed from the said office. SSP 1/25 wp 10185 of 2025.doc Background facts: 3. Shorn of superfluities, the background facts can be stated as under : 3.1 In the election to the Wakalwadi Village Panchayat held in the year 2021, the Petitioner came to be elected for the term of five years. The Petitioner was subsequently elected as Sarpanch of the said Village Panchayat. Respondent No.5, a member of the said Village Panchayat, lodge

MANGAL MAHADU KORDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. MINISTRY AND ORS · Niyam