MAMRAJ vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~92 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 20.04.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1527/2026, CRL.M.A. 12209/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12234/2026 MAMRAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Rexwal and Mr. Aditya, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 78/2026 of PS Pul Prahlad Pur for offence under Section 110/3(5) BNS. 2. It is 01:25 pm. This interim bail application has been received by way of second supplementary list after mentioning was allowed by the Hon’ble Chief Justice. 3. At the outset, learned APP points out that the accused/applicant has not disclosed that his regular bail application is already pending before the trial court and is listed on 28.04.2026. As pointed out by learned APP, the BAIL APPLN. 1527/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835 d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2ee e60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.20 05:44:47 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:20.04.2026 18:33:16 trial court rejected the interim bail application on the ground that the marriage in question is not of an immediate family member of the accused/applicant and allegations against the accused/applicant are of serious nature. 4. Learned counsel for accused/applicant does not dispute that the bail application of the accused/applicant is pending before the Court of Sessions and this fact has not been disclosed in the present ba