MAHESH VALUE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs RIKHAB CHAND JAIN & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 16.04.2026 + FAO (COMM) 88/2026 CM APPL. 19795/2026 CM APPL. 19796/2026 MAHESH VALUE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Mr. Dhruv Sikka, Mr. Lakshay Gupta, Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Ms. Mokshita Gautam, Ms. Shreya Jain, and Ms. Urvashi Arora, Ms. Yashika Sehgal, Ms Annanya Mehan, Advs. versus RIKHAB CHAND JAIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Raao and Ms. Anju Kumari, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Manas Raghuvanshi and Mr. Gyanendra Rathour, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL) 1. This appeal lays challenge to an order dated 14.03.2026 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court-10), Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the learned District Judge has by appointing a Local Commissioner, on an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2, CPC filed by the respondent nos. 1& 2 restrained the appellant from using the Signature Not Verified FAO (COMM) 88/2026 Page 1 of 7 Digitally Signed By:RASHMI DABAS Signing Date:20.04.2026 10:36:12 trademark ‘TT’ in the following manner: “ In the facts and circumstances as already discussed a prima facie case appears in favour of plaintiff. Initial balance of convenience also appears in his favour as plaintiff is registered trademark owner and prima facie defendant do not appear to have any right to store or sell counterfeit goods containing mark of plaintiff. In the facts and circumstances, till further orders, by way of an ad-interim ex-parte injunction, the Defendants, their directors, partners, servants, principals, agents, stockiest, associates or any of them acting for, claiming under or through or on behal