Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-04-10

MAHARASHTRA RAJYA SURAKSHA RAKSHAK AND GENERAL KAMGAR UNION vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DEPT AND ORS

Citation / case number
WP/13340/2025
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
MAHARASHTRA RAJYA SURAKSHA RAKSHAK AND GENERAL KAMGAR UNION
Respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DEPT AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

RJ-WP 13340.2025.doc Kavita S.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.13340 OF 2025 Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & …Petitioner General Kamgar Union Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors., …Respondents ---------- Mr. Avinash Belge for Petitioner. M.M. Pabale, AGP for State / Respondent No.1. Mr. Amardev J. Uniyal a/w B.L.Mangale for Respondent No.2. Mr. Amrut Joshi a/w Ms. Kajal Gupta, Ms. Shweta Singh, S.D. Shetty, Dheer Sampat, Mr. Yazad Udwadia i/b M.V. Kini & Co. for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 (IIT Bombay). ---------- CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA AND ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. RESERVED ON : 26th MARCH, 2026. PRONOUNCED ON : 10th APRIL, 2026. JUDGMENT: (Per R.I. Chagla, J.) 1. By this Writ Petition, the Petitioner – Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak and General Kamgar Union has on behalf of its KAVITA SUSHIL JADHAV Digitally signed Security Guard members, totaling 81 Security Guards, a list of which by KAVITA SUSHIL JADHAV Date: 2026.04.10 19:19:19 +0530 has been annexed at Exhibit-A to the Petition, sought quashing and 1/19 RJ-WP 13340.2025.doc setting aside of the impugned Letter dated 11 th August, 2025 (Exhibit-D to the Petition) and impugned Letter dated 25 th August, 2025 (Exhibit-F to the Petition) issued by Respondent No.4 terminating the service of the Security Guards listed at Exhibit-A working in different Departments of Respondent No.3 Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (“IIT”). Further direction is sought against Respondent Nos.3 and 4 - IIT to continue the service of the registered Security Guards allotted to them by the Respondent No.2 – Board and whose names are listed at Exhibit-A to the Petition. 2. The Petitioner – Union who has filed the present Petition on behalf of Security Guards who are members of the

MAHARASHTRA RAJYA SURAKSHA RAKSHAK AND GENERAL KAMGAR UNION vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DEPT AND ORS · Niyam