Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-01

M/S KRISHAN KUMAR SOLE PROPRIETOR M/S BALAJI GLOWTICS vs M/S JAILAXMI ENTERPRISES PVT LTD

Citation / case number
CM(M)-2569/2024 2026:DHC:2703
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S KRISHAN KUMAR SOLE PROPRIETOR M/S BALAJI GLOWTICS
Respondent
M/S JAILAXMI ENTERPRISES PVT LTD
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 28th March, 2026 Date of Decision: 01st April, 2026 CM(M) 2569/2024 & CM APPL. 28662/2024 M/S KRISHAN KUMAR SOLE PROPRIETOR M/S BALAJI GLOWTICS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Virendra Rawat, Mr. Rishabh Sharma and Mr. Siddharth N., Advs. versus M/S JAILAXMI ENTERPRISES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubham Jai and Mr. Ashish Kumar Arya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 12th January 2024 passed by the learned Trial Court in C.S. (COMM.) No. 37/2023, whereby the applications filed by the petitioner - one under Order VIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking restoration of the right to file the written statement, and another application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement have been dismissed. 2. Heard. Record perused. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the written statement could not be filed within the stipulated time granted by the learned Trial Court, as the petitioner was unable to communicate with