KRISHAN KUMAR SINGH ALIAS KRISHAN LAL AND ORS vs STATE THROUGH SHO P S SAKET AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~97 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21stApril, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3021/2026 &CRL.M.A. 12283/2026 KRISHAN KUMAR SINGH ALIAS KRISHAN LAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prashant Solanki with Mr. Mohit Sehrawat, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus STATE THROUGH SHO P S SAKET AND ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Abad Haider, PS Saket Mr. Karan Prakash, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 121/2023 dated 01.04.2023, registered at Police Station Saket, Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 15.03.2021, as per Hindu rites and customs. There is no child from the abovesaid wedlock. 3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties started residing separately and when a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, it Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 3021/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:23.04.2026 18:11:06 resulted into registration of the abovesaid FIR. 4. Charge-sheet has already been filed. 5. Fact, however, remains that when parties were referred to Mediation, they were able to resolve all their disputes under the aegis of Delhi Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New, Delhi vide Mediation order dated 29.03.2025. 6. It is in the abovesaid backdrop that quashing is being sought. 7. Petitioners are present in person. 8. Respondent no. 2 is present in person and she has been identified by her counsel and