Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-25

KISHAN KUMAR GUPTA vs RAJ KUMAR

Citation / case number
RSA-150/2024 2026:DHC:3457
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
KISHAN KUMAR GUPTA
Respondent
RAJ KUMAR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 13th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 25th April 2026 + RSA No.150/2024, CM APPL. 47257/2024 (stay) KISHAN KUMAR GUPTA S/o Late Om Prakash Gupta R/o 291/1, D-6, Sector-6, Rohini, Delhi-110085 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Galib Kabir, Advocate. versus RAJ KUMAR S/o Late Bishan Sarup R/o 3139, Lal Darwaza Bazaar Sita Ram Delhi-110006 .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Second Regular Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to ‘CPC‟) has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against the Judgment dated 14.05.2024, whereby the learned District Judge-06, Central District, Delhi in RCA DJ No. 16/2019, has upheld the Judgment and Decree dated 18.12.2018 of the learned Civil Judge whereby the Suit of the Plaintiff for Recovery of Rs.2,84,500/-, has been dismissed. 2. The Substantial question of Law that arises in the present Appeal is: 3. The Plaintiff/Appellant had filed a Suit for Recovery of Rs.2,84,500/- along with the pendente lite and future interest @18% p.a. against Defendant. 4. The fa