Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-17

JINDAL FERROUS LIMITED vs A TO Z COMPANY

Citation / case number
ARB.P.-2108/2025 2026:DHC:3207
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
JINDAL FERROUS LIMITED
Respondent
A TO Z COMPANY
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 17.04.2026 ARB.P. 2108/2025 JINDAL FERROUS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarad Kumar Sunny and Ms. Madhav Binzani, Advocates. versus A TO Z COMPANY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Alok Raj, Mr. Madhav Suri, Mr. Akhand Shresth Pandey, Mr. Anurag Kumar Singh, Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, Mr. Ashutosh Pandey and Ms. Akanksha Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes arising out of the Service Order dated 02.02.20232. 2. The Agreement is stated to contain a Dispute Resolution Clause, which contemplates adjudication of disputes arising out of the Agreement, inter se the parties, by way of Arbitration. In this regard, 1 Act 2 Agreement 16. GOVERNING LAW AND ARBITRATION This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India. The Parties shall endeavor to settle all disputes and differences relating to and/ or arising out of this Agreement amicably. In the event the Partie

JINDAL FERROUS LIMITED vs A TO Z COMPANY · Niyam