Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-27

JAGRIT KATHURIA AND ORS vs GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-14516/2022 2026:DHC:3714
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
JAGRIT KATHURIA AND ORS
Respondent
GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27th April, 2026. W.P.(C) 14516/2022 & CM APPL. 56647/2023 JAGRIT KATHURIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shivani Kher, Mr. Rakesh Lakra and Mr. Rishabh Shivhare, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Manisha Agrawal N. and Mr. Nipun Jain, Advocates for R-3. Ms. Pearl Sharma, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J. (Oral): 1. The Petitioners, who were engaged as teaching faculty in HMR Institute of Technology & Management, have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution assailing the termination notices dated 16 th September, 2022 issued by Respondent No. 2. They also seek reinstatement with consequential benefits. Facts 2. The dispute, in substance, arises from the termination of teaching 2015. Some of them entered service as Lecturers and were later appointed as Assistant Professors. The appointment record is not uniform in expression. Certain earlier letters described the engagement as temporary or contractual. The lat