HOME RESIDENCY INFRATECH PVT LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR DEEPANSH KALRA vs SURJEET SINGH GEHLAUT AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~107 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1103/2023 and CM APPL.1308/2024 HOME RESIDENCY INFRATECH PVT LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR DEEPANSH KALRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Samridhi Arora and Ms. Sanjana, Advs. versus SURJEET SINGH GEHLAUT AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bal Kishan Bhatia, Ms. Nupur and Mr. Mandeep Kumar, Advs. for R-1 to 13. Mr. Vikrant Nath Goyal, Ms. Satvika Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya and Mr. Inderpreet Singh, Advs. for Delhi Police. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition alleges contempt / wilful disobedience of the order dated 30.08.2022, passed by ADJ-05 (SW), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in CS No.808/2022. 2. It transpires that the civil suit is still pending consideration. 3. In the circumstances, assuming there has been any wilful disobedience of the interim order during subsistence thereof, it is open for the petitioner to agitate the said aspect in the ongoing civil proceedings, and seek appropriate directions. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 1103/2023 Page 1 of 2 By:CHINU LUTHRA Signing Date:30.04.2026 17:18:57 4. Considering the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present contempt petition. 5. The same is accordingly, disposed of. However, the right of the petitioner to raise any plea as may be permissible under law, in the ongoing civil proceedings, is reserved. APRIL 27, 2026/cl SACHIN DATTA, J Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 1103/2023 Page 2 of 2 By:CHINU LUTHRA Signing Date:30.04.2026 17:18:57