HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR. vs DR. VIJAY PURUSHOTTAM KALE

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: 12.03.2026 & 13.03.2026 % Judgment Delivered on: 07.04.2026 + LPA 119/2026 & CM No.15024/2026 HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR. .....Appellants versus DR. VIJAY PURUSHOTTAM KALE .....Respondent + LPA 120/2026 & CM No.15026/2026 HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR. .....Appellants versus DR. SATISHCHANDRA P KALE & ANR. .....Respondents + LPA 123/2026 & CM No.15460/2026 HETALI ENTERPRISES & ANR. .....Appellants versus DR. PURUSHOTTAM G. KALE .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in these cases For the Appellants : Mr. Robin Jaisinghani, Mr. Bhaskar Nayak and Ms. J. D’ Silva, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Viraj Kadam, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA Signature Not Verified Signed By:NEELAM LPA 119/2026 with connected matters Page 1 of 11 SHARMA Signing Date:07.04.2026 15:32:37 JUDGMENT TEJAS KARIA, J 1. The present batch of Letters Patent Appeals have been preferred against the common judgment and order dated 07.01.2026 (“Impugned Order”) passed in W.P.(C) 10901/2022 , W.P.(C) 10921/2022 and W.P.(C) 10922/2022 (“Writ Petitions”), whereby the Writ Petitions challenging order dated 13.05.2022 (“Review Order”) passed in the Review Applications filed by the Appellants before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (“NCDRC”) seeking review of order dated 08.12.2021 (“Final Order”) passed by the NCDRC were dismissed. FACTUAL MATRIX 2. The brief factual matrix reading up to the filing of the present Appeals is as under: 2.1. The Respondents had filed the respective complaints before the NCDRC under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“Act”) against the Appellant and the Andheri Nav-Bahar Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. (“Society”) seeking compensation tow