HARSHDEEP @ NONU & ORS. vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~77& 78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 08thApril, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 1509/2025 HARSHDEEP @ NONU & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Deeksha Anand, Proxy counsel. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State with SI Pushpendra Singh. Mr. AK Verma, Advocate for R-2 alongwith Respondent No.2 in person. + W.P.(CRL) 1287/2025 HARISH SAGAR & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Verma, Advocate alongwith Petitioner in person. versus THE STATE & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Pushpendra Singh. Ms. Deeksha Anand, Proxy counsel for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Both these petitions seek quashing of respective FIRs and being connected and cross-cases, both the petitions have been taken up together. 2. In CRL.M.C. 1509/2025, all the seven petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0574/2024 dated 02.11.2024, registered at Police Station Jagat Puri, for commission of offence under Section 110 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Section 308 IPC), along with all consequential Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 1509/2025 & W.P.(CRL) 1287/2025 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:10.04.2026 15:06:06 proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. Petitioner No.1 (in CRL.M.C. 1509/2025) is, reportedly, in Finland where he is pursuing his studies. 3. In the abovesaid incident, the injuries were received by two persons i.e. Braj Bahadur Singh and his son Daksh and they both are present in person and have been duly identified by their counsel as well as by investigating officer. They reiterate the terms of settlement. 4. Settlement took place between