HARSH MITTAL vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 16thApril, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2864/2026 HARSH MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar and Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Ashish Panwar, PS Gazipur. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A. 11654/2026 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 2864/2026 1. Petitioner herein seeks quashing of FIR No.369/2022 dated 30.06.2022, registered at Police Station Ghazipur, for commission of offences under Sections 279/338 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. As per the case of prosecution, petitioner was driving Hyundai I 10 in a rash and negligent manner and, while driving so, hit one scooterist, which resulted in grievous injuries to such scooterist i.e. Sh. Pankaj Bisht. 3. Charge-sheet has already been filed. 4. Fact, however, remains that when the parties were referred to Delhi Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 2864/2026 1 Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:18.04.2026 16:04:24 Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, the parties were able to resolve all their disputes, as would be apparent from Mediation order dated 27.09.2025. 5. In terms of settlement, the petitioner, who had even rushed the injured to the hospital himself, has agreed to make payment of Rs.25,000/- to injured towards reimbursement of his medical expenditure and compensation. The injured has, reportedly, already received a sum of Rs.1,80,000/- with respect to MACT Claim. 6. Petitioner is present in Court. 7. Respondent no. 2 is present in